Ronald kahn, author of the supreme court and constitutional theory, 19531993 a timely, important, meticulously researched, and wellwritten book that makes a valuable contribution to constitutional theory and is the best work on constitutional interpretation that i have read. By rewriting and or ignoring the original intent of the authors of the founding documents of america, a socalled politically correct movement has corrupted the american way by usurping every branch of our government and is turning our constitutional. Bork is committed to interpreting the constitution in accordance with what he believes constitutes the original intent of the framers of the constitution. It also shows how originalism helps realize the democratic promise of the constitution without relying on assumptions of judicial restraint, sharply distinguishing between democracy and majoritarianism.
Chief among these is that a thoroughgoing originalism would require one to accept the once. Interpretation of the constitution is an openended and continuing process. Powell argued that the founders didnt think their intentions should govern in the future, and therefore a method of constitutional interpretation privileging such intent was. This book provides the kind of scholarly resource that educated citizens need to think for themselves, a rich digest of primary sources documentingin their own wordsthe views, motives, and intentions of the framers, historic commentators, legislators, and judiciary who have debated the right to keep and bear arms from the origins of our republic. The hon justice michael kirby ac cmg there are few issues of greater legal importance than the principles which should guide the interpretation of the australian constitution.
During his nearly quarter of a century on the supreme court, justice clarence thomas has pursued an original general meaning approach to constitutional interpretation. Whittington, william nelson cromwell professor of politics, princeton university, author of constitutional interpretation. Jefferson powell, the modern misunderstanding of original intent, 54 u. Originalism, or, original intent originalists think that the best way to interpret the constitution is to determine how the framers intended the constitution to be interpreted. Using original intent analysis of the first kind, we can discern that the language of article iii of the u. Barber and fleming contend that fidelity in constitutional interpretation requires a fusion. Book history and constitutional interpretation the following guest post is by drew starling, a phd candidate in history at the university of pennsylvania, and sean nadel, a jd candidate at columbia university.
My purpose is to offer an other reading of major chunks of the evidence that professor powell himself cites, although in the following pages i occasionally stray to. The theory of interpretation by which judges attempt to ascertain the meaning of a particular provision of a state or federal constitution by determining how the provision was understood at the time it was drafted and ratified. The current political and social debate about constitutional jurisprudence is appropriately framed here by jaffa, professor emeritus of political philosophy at claremont graduate schools. Justice arthur goldberg talks about a recent complaint that the supreme court has strayed from the original intent of the founding fathers. What, powell asks, was the original understanding of original intent. The book also shows how originalism helps realize the democratic promise of the constitution without relying on assumptions of judicial restraint. Original intent is a theory in law concerning constitutional and statutory interpretation. Supreme court justice antonin scalia is one of the leading proponents of originalism as a theory of constitutional interpretation. The classification of the different schools of constitutional interpretation is messy, to say the least. In the context of united states law, originalism is a concept regarding the interpretation of the. From constitutional interpretation to judicial activism. Part ii clarifies the definition of original intention interpretation and shows that.
The amendment process is too difficult and cannot be relied upon to save us. This book breaks free of the stalemate and reinvigorates the debate over how the judiciary should. A collection of theories calling for adherence to the original intent of the creators of the constitution. This notion stands in contrast to the concept of the living constitution, which. Whereas textualist approaches to constitutional interpretation focus solely on the text of the document, originalist approaches consider the meaning of the constitution as understood by at least some segment of the populace at the time of the founding. Constitutional theory and judicial interpretation are major ways to understand the u.
This conclusion has real consequences for arguments about original intent. Panelists debated constitutional interpretation and. The original intent of the framers ought not to engage us because the document they drafted was, quite frankly, not theirs. University press of kansas description this book reconsiders the implications of the fundamental legal commitment to faithfully interpret our written constitution. This topic page concerns the various interpretations of the constitution that have evolved over time.
Great collection of evidence to explain and support original intent constitutional interpretation. Constitutional interpretation reconsiders the implications of the fundamental legal commitment to faithfully interpret our written constitution. The courts have repeatedly held that when a statute is clear and unambiguous, the inquiry into legislative intent ends at that point. Judicial interpretation refers to different ways that the judiciary uses to interpret the law, particularly constitutional documents and legislation. For an extended excerpt from justice scalias originalism, the lesser evil, click here.
Justice antonin scalia discussed his book, reading law. Among its many legacies, the reagan administration will be remembered for its spirited defense of a jurisprudence of original intent the simplistic assertion that the constitution has a fixed and. The original meaning theory, which is closely related to textualism, is the view that. It is often said that the constitution should be interpreted according to its original intent, original understanding, or original meaning. The core of originalism is the belief that fidelity to the original understanding of the constitution should constrain contemporary judges. Fourteen ways to interpret the constitution huffpost. It is frequently used as a synonym for originalism. One form original intent looks to the plain meaning of the constitutional words cruel and unusual punishment and, if that meaning does not decide a case 200 years later, that. Types of originalism include strict interpretation and strict constructionism. This book reconsiders the implications of the fundamental legal commitment to faithfully interpret our written constitution. The collected antifederalist papers, of course, will be no use at all to a person searching for the original intent. Herndon in his essay, original intent and the free exercise of religion, joseph zavaletta, jr.
They look to several sources to determine this intent, including the contemporary writings of the framers, newspaper articles, the federalist papers, and the notes from the constitutional convention itself. A brief history of originalism in american constitutional interpretation. Book shows significant wear but is still a good reading copy. An example of original intent reasoning is found in katz v. It is only when a statute could be interpreted in more than one fashion that legislative intent must be inferred from sources other than the actual text of the statute. It was a little far in the weeds for a nonlawyer like me and i read it on a kindle which is the wrong format for books with appendices and foot notes. Original intent, original understanding, original meaning. The original understanding of original intent by h.
Making use of arguments drawn from american history, political philosophy, and literary theory, it examines what it means to interpret a written constitution and how the courts should go about that task. Social facts, constitutional interpretation, and the rule of. Also, to suggest hamilton and jays absence from the convention implies their ignorance as to the constitution s original meaning is demeaning to those two men and inaccurate. Whereas textualist approaches to constitutional interpretation focus solely on. It is now understood that original meaning, not original intent, is the most appropriate originalist source of constitutional law. Oxford scholarship online requires a subscription or purchase to access the full text of books within the service.
Deceased justice antonin scalia might be called the original originalist and is credited with making this historical approach to legal interpretation a popular subject of discussion among. Robert bork has staked his career and made his livelihood on the particular approach that he takes to constitutional interpretation. The book demonstrates how originalist methods can be reconciled with an appropriate understanding of legal interpretation and why originalism has much to teach all constitutional theorists. This book heavily emphasizes the importance of reading original source documents from the founders themselves as well as the writings that they studied. In united states constitutional interpretation, the living constitution or loose constructionism is the claim that the constitution and other constitutions, holds a dynamic meaning, evolving and adapting to new circumstances, without being formally amended. The original meaning of constitutional language sometimes focuses. Debates over originalism have been a central focus of contemporary constitutional theory for three decades. Original intent and the framers of the constitution. Mar 03, 2006 madison actually said nothing specific about the general authority of the courts constitutional interpretation marburys intent was to show that the courts can refuse to give effect to.
Great practical advice for christians interacting with the modern deconstruction of american jurisprudence. In the context of united states law, originalism is a concept regarding the interpretation of the constitution that asserts that all statements in the constitution must be interpreted based on the original understanding of the authors or the people at the time it was ratified. Constitutional scholars and leading jurists have long been preoccupied with elaborating different possible interpretive methods, such as an originalintent approach, an originalmeaning approach, john hart elys representationreinforcement. The constitutions meaning is to be found in the history of interpretations and constitutional law rather than what the framers originally had in mind. Turning to the history of the constitutions framing, ratification, and early interpretation, professor powell argues that although early constitutional discourse did contain references to original intention and the intent of the framers, the meaning of such terms was markedly different from their current usage. The book tees up the issue of the extent to which the jurisprudential ideologies the late justice spent his lifetime toutingoriginalism for interpreting the constitution and textualism for deciphering statuteswere and are serious and meritorious efforts at jurisprudence, or, on the contrary, mere slogans to gussy up a. Original intent legal definition of original intent. Buy used on clicking this link, a new layer will be open. This book breaks free of the stalemate and reinvigorates the debate over how the judiciary should interpret the constitution. It was written to show the original intent of the founders of our country with regard to religion and the first amendment. The courts, the constitution, and religion and millions of other books are available for amazon kindle. Constitutional interpretation university press of kansas. The framers first words were suggestive but not definitive.
Enter your mobile number or email address below and well send you a link to download the free kindle app. The basic questions illustrates that these approaches cannot avoid philosophic reflection and choice in interpreting the constitution. Problems of constitutional interpretation have many faces, but much of the contemporary discussion has focused on what has come to be called originalism. Barber and fleming contend that fidelity in constitutional interpretation requires a fusion of philosophic and other approaches, properly understood. This article reexamines the shift from the subjective intent of the constitution makers to the original public meaning of the constitution s words. Original intention and public meaning in constitutional. Public users can however freely search the site and view the abstracts and keywords for each book and. Cover and pages are in tact but may show creases, tears, water damage, handwriting, underlining, or highlighting.
An introduction to constitutional law featured on life. There are two general categories of justifications offered by originalists. A primer on scalias constitutional philosophy nprs nina totenberg explains how the idea that the constitution is not living but dead transformed the supreme court during antonin. The constitution referred to as the living law of the land as it is transformed according to necessities of the time and situation. Followers of original meaning, including antonin scalia, believe that the clauses and words of the constitution should be interpreted based on definitions to those framers who crafted the document at the time. Originalisms core is that the constitutions meaning was fixed at the time of. Constitutional interpretation, or constitutional construction, the term more often used by the founders, is the process by which legal decisions are made that are justified by a constitution, although not necessarily correctly. Theories of constitutional interpretation umkc school of law. The original understanding of original intent duke law scholarship. A living constitution is said to develop alongside the needs of a society, providing a. The paperback of the constitutional interpretation.
Nonoriginalism allows judges to head off the crises that could result from the inflexible interpretation of a provision in the constitution that no longer serves its original purpose. If intentions are to count for something, they must be the intentions of the people who approved it, not the intentions of those who proposed it. One of the features of this debate has been disagreement about what originalism is. Woodrow wilson argued in his 1908 book, constitutional.
The constitutional topics pages at the site are presented to delve deeper into topics than can be provided on the glossary page or in the faq pages. Constitution was to delegate to congress the power to allocate original and appellate jurisdictions, and not to remove some jurisdiction, involving a constitutional question, from all courts. There are various theories about how this task should be performed ranging from obedience to original intent, through. Those that follow original intent would interpret an action based on how the constitutional framers would have wanted and reacted. This is a very useful book for anyone who wants to understand the longstanding debate between constitutional originalists those who say that judges should look to the original meaning or intent of the constitution and living constitutionalists those who claim that judges can sometimes depart from original meaning to adapt the constitution to changing times. The historical argument is largely, though not exclusively, associated with the theory of original intent or original understanding, under which constitutional and legal interpretation is limited to attempting to discern the original meaning of the words being construed as that meaning is revealed in the intentions of those who created the law.
Making use of arguments drawn from american history, political philosophy, and literary theory, he examines what it means to interpret a written constitution and how the courts should go about that task. Robert borks approach to constitutional interpretation. In it, bork outlines a theory of original intent in constitutional interpretation that is meant as an answer to his liberal opponents. Anyone who wants of understand the meaning and intent of the constitution need this book in their reference library. Any theory of constitutional interpretation that completely ignores either text or original intentions and.
1635 908 259 1301 1124 393 1182 260 1656 1194 909 781 260 653 945 514 194 334 282 1131 1552 480 125 1036 504 943 1556 452 486 1585 1365 1637 660 1137 963 1137 1534 1644 1328 762 709 892 1050 355 1340 44